首页> 外文OA文献 >Ray-tracing through the Millennium Simulation: Born corrections and lens-lens coupling in cosmic shear and galaxy-galaxy lensing
【2h】

Ray-tracing through the Millennium Simulation: Born corrections and lens-lens coupling in cosmic shear and galaxy-galaxy lensing

机译:通过千年模拟的光线追踪:出生的修正和   宇宙剪切和星系 - 星系透镜中的透镜 - 透镜耦合

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

(abridged) We study the accuracy of various approximations to cosmic shearand weak galaxy-galaxy lensing and investigate effects of Born corrections andlens-lens coupling. We use ray-tracing through the Millennium Simulation tocalculate various cosmic-shear and galaxy-galaxy-lensing statistics. We comparethe results from ray-tracing to semi-analytic predictions. We find: (i) Thelinear approximation provides an excellent fit to cosmic-shear power spectra aslong as the actual matter power spectrum is used as input. Common fittingformulae, however, strongly underestimate the cosmic-shear power spectra. Halomodels provide a better fit to cosmic shear-power spectra, but there are stillnoticeable deviations. (ii) Cosmic-shear B-modes induced by Born correctionsand lens-lens coupling are at least three orders of magnitude smaller thancosmic-shear E-modes. Semi-analytic extensions to the linear approximationpredict the right order of magnitude for the B-mode. Compared to theray-tracing results, however, the semi-analytic predictions may differ by afactor two on small scales and also show a different scale dependence. (iii)The linear approximation may under- or overestimate the galaxy-galaxy-lensingshear signal by several percent due to the neglect of magnification bias, whichmay lead to a correlation between the shear and the observed number density oflenses. We conclude: (i) Current semi-analytic models need to be improved inorder to match the degree of statistical accuracy expected for futureweak-lensing surveys. (ii) Shear B-modes induced by corrections to the linearapproximation are not important for future cosmic-shear surveys. (iii)Magnification bias can be important for galaxy-galaxy-lensing surveys.
机译:(节略的)我们研究宇宙剪切和弱星系-星系透镜的各种近似的准确性,并研究Born校正和透镜-透镜耦合的影响。我们通过千年模拟使用光线跟踪来计算各种宇宙剪切和星系-星系镜头的统计数据。我们将光线跟踪的结果与半解析预测进行比较。我们发现:(i)只要将实际物质功率谱用作输入,线性近似就可以很好地拟合宇宙切变功率谱。但是,普通的拟合公式强烈地低估了宇宙剪切功率谱。 Halomodels更适合于宇宙剪切功率谱,但仍存在明显的偏差。 (ii)玻恩校正和透镜-透镜耦合引起的宇宙剪切B模式比宇宙剪切E模式小至少三个数量级。线性逼近的半解析扩展预测了B模式的正确数量级。但是,与光线追踪结果相比,半解析预测在小尺度上可能相差两个因数,并且还显示出不同的尺度依赖性。 (iii)由于忽略了放大偏差,线性近似可能会低估或高估星系-星系-镜头剪切信号百分之几,这可能导致剪切力和观测到的透镜数密度之间的相关性。我们得出以下结论:(i)当前的半分析模型需要改进,以匹配未来弱视调查预期的统计准确性程度。 (ii)由线性近似校正引起的剪切B模式对于未来的宇宙剪切测量并不重要。 (iii)放大偏差对于星系-星系镜头调查可能很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号